網站首頁 編程語言 正文
前段時間碰到個奇怪的索引失效的問題,實際情況類似下面這樣:
bill=# begin;
BEGIN
bill=*# create index idx_t1 on t1(id);
CREATE INDEX
bill=*# explain select * from t1 where id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on t1 (cost=0.00..25.88 rows=6 width=36)
Filter: (id = 1)
(2 rows)
bill=*# end;
COMMIT
bill=# explain select * from t1 where id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Bitmap Heap Scan on t1 (cost=1.50..7.01 rows=6 width=36)
Recheck Cond: (id = 1)
-> Bitmap Index Scan on idx_t1 (cost=0.00..1.50 rows=6 width=0)
Index Cond: (id = 1)
(4 rows)
很顯然的問題就是,我在事務中創(chuàng)建了索引,卻沒辦法使用。但是當事務提交了后便可以正常使用了,這是什么情況呢?
這個其實和pg_index中indcheckxmin屬性有關,關于這個字段的解釋如下:
If true, queries must not use the index until the xmin of this pg_index row is below their TransactionXmin event horizon, because the table may contain broken HOT chains with incompatible rows that they can see
經檢查也確實如此:
bill=*# select indcheckxmin from pg_index where indexrelid = 'idx_t1'::regclass;
indcheckxmin
--------------
t
(1 row)
那么問題來了,什么情況下創(chuàng)建索引時會將索引的該屬性設置為true呢?
從前面官方文檔對于該字段的解釋,如果表中包含broken HOT chains 則會為true,那什么是broken HOT chains ?似乎和HOT機制有關。那是不是只有存在broken HOT chains 才會設置為true呢?
這里就不賣關子了,直接給出結論,然后我們再去一一驗證。
經測試發(fā)現(xiàn),以下兩種情況會導致索引的indcheckxmin設置為true:
- 當前事務中表上存在broken HOT chains,即官方文檔中所說;
- 當old_snapshot_threshold被設置時。
場景一:broken HOT chains
這種情況,只要在當前事務中表中存在HOT更新的行時就會存在。那么什么時候會進行HOT更新呢?兩個前提:
- 新的元組和舊元組必須在同一個page中;
- 索引字段不能進行更新。
既然如此,實際中常見的兩種情況就是:
- 對表上最后一個page進行更新;
- 表設置了fillfactor,即每個page上有預留的空閑空間。
例子:
表中插入10條數(shù)據,自然只有1個page:
bill=# insert into t1 select generate_series(1,10),md5(random()::text);
INSERT 0 10
進行更新:
bill=# update t1 set info = 'bill' where id = 10;
UPDATE 1
查看發(fā)現(xiàn)的確是HOT更新:
關于t_infomask2字段的解釋這里就不再贅述。
接下來我們創(chuàng)建索引:
可以發(fā)現(xiàn)indcheckxmin被設置為true,在當前事務中索引不可用。
經過驗證,在index_build階段,判斷到BrokenHotChain,便將indcheckxmin修改為true。
具體的修改代碼如下:
/*此時indexInfo->ii_BrokenHotChain已被修改為true */
if ((indexInfo->ii_BrokenHotChain || EarlyPruningEnabled(heapRelation)) &&
!isreindex &&
!indexInfo->ii_Concurrent)
{
Oid indexId = RelationGetRelid(indexRelation);
Relation pg_index;
HeapTuple indexTuple;
Form_pg_index indexForm;
pg_index = table_open(IndexRelationId, RowExclusiveLock);
indexTuple = SearchSysCacheCopy1(INDEXRELID,
ObjectIdGetDatum(indexId));
if (!HeapTupleIsValid(indexTuple))
elog(ERROR, "cache lookup failed for index %u", indexId);
indexForm = (Form_pg_index) GETSTRUCT(indexTuple);
/* If it's a new index, indcheckxmin shouldn't be set ... */
Assert(!indexForm->indcheckxmin);
/*將indcheckxmin修改為true */
indexForm->indcheckxmin = true;
CatalogTupleUpdate(pg_index, &indexTuple->t_self, indexTuple);
heap_freetuple(indexTuple);
table_close(pg_index, RowExclusiveLock);
}
同樣我們也可以驗證得知,的確是因為brokenhotchains導致的indcheckxmin被設置為true。
場景二:old_snapshot_threshold
先來看例子:
最簡單的場景,完全的一張空表,在事務中創(chuàng)建索引indcheckxmin就會被設置為true,果然索引也是不可用。
bill=# drop table t1;
DROP TABLE
bill=# create table t1(id int,info text);
CREATE TABLE
bill=# begin;
BEGIN
bill=*# create index idx_t1 on t1(id);
CREATE INDEX
bill=*# select indcheckxmin from pg_index where indexrelid = 'idx_t1'::regclass;
indcheckxmin
--------------
t
(1 row)
bill=*# explain select * from t1 where id = 1;
QUERY PLAN
----------------------------------------------------
Seq Scan on t1 (cost=0.00..25.88 rows=6 width=36)
Filter: (id = 1)
(2 rows)
那么為什么old_snapshot_threshold會產生這樣的影響呢?
經過跟蹤發(fā)現(xiàn),當開啟該參數(shù)時,在事務中創(chuàng)建索引的snapshotdata結構如下:
(SnapshotData) $6 = {
? snapshot_type = SNAPSHOT_MVCC
? xmin = 856
? xmax = 856
? xip = 0x00007fd55c804fc0
? xcnt = 0
? subxip = 0x00007fd55ad5d000
? subxcnt = 0
? suboverflowed = false
? takenDuringRecovery = false
? copied = false
? curcid = 1
? speculativeToken = 0
? vistest = NULL
? active_count = 0
? regd_count = 0
? ph_node = {
? ? first_child = NULL
? ? next_sibling = NULL
? ? prev_or_parent = NULL
? }
? whenTaken = 691752041261069
? lsn = 208079736
}
而禁用該參數(shù)呢?
(SnapshotData) $7 = {
? snapshot_type = SNAPSHOT_MVCC
? xmin = 828
? xmax = 828
? xip = 0x00007fad31704780
? xcnt = 0
? subxip = 0x00007fad3155d000
? subxcnt = 0
? suboverflowed = false
? takenDuringRecovery = false
? copied = false
? curcid = 1
? speculativeToken = 0
? active_count = 0
? regd_count = 0
? ph_node = {
? ? first_child = NULL
? ? next_sibling = NULL
? ? prev_or_parent = NULL
? }
? whenTaken = 0
? lsn = 0
}
可以看到,區(qū)別在于不使用該參數(shù)時,創(chuàng)建snapshotdata不會設置whenTaken和lsn,那么這兩個參數(shù)是干嘛的呢?
先來看看snapshotdata的結構:
typedef struct SnapshotData
{
SnapshotType snapshot_type; /* type of snapshot */
/*
* The remaining fields are used only for MVCC snapshots, and are normally
* just zeroes in special snapshots. (But xmin and xmax are used
* specially by HeapTupleSatisfiesDirty, and xmin is used specially by
* HeapTupleSatisfiesNonVacuumable.)
*
* An MVCC snapshot can never see the effects of XIDs >= xmax. It can see
* the effects of all older XIDs except those listed in the snapshot. xmin
* is stored as an optimization to avoid needing to search the XID arrays
* for most tuples.
*/
TransactionId xmin; /* all XID < xmin are visible to me */
TransactionId xmax; /* all XID >= xmax are invisible to me */
/*
* For normal MVCC snapshot this contains the all xact IDs that are in
* progress, unless the snapshot was taken during recovery in which case
* it's empty. For historic MVCC snapshots, the meaning is inverted, i.e.
* it contains *committed* transactions between xmin and xmax.
*
* note: all ids in xip[] satisfy xmin <= xip[i] < xmax
*/
TransactionId *xip;
uint32 xcnt; /* # of xact ids in xip[] */
/*
* For non-historic MVCC snapshots, this contains subxact IDs that are in
* progress (and other transactions that are in progress if taken during
* recovery). For historic snapshot it contains *all* xids assigned to the
* replayed transaction, including the toplevel xid.
*
* note: all ids in subxip[] are >= xmin, but we don't bother filtering
* out any that are >= xmax
*/
TransactionId *subxip;
int32 subxcnt; /* # of xact ids in subxip[] */
bool suboverflowed; /* has the subxip array overflowed? */
bool takenDuringRecovery; /* recovery-shaped snapshot? */
bool copied; /* false if it's a static snapshot */
CommandId curcid; /* in my xact, CID < curcid are visible */
/*
* An extra return value for HeapTupleSatisfiesDirty, not used in MVCC
* snapshots.
*/
uint32 speculativeToken;
/*
* For SNAPSHOT_NON_VACUUMABLE (and hopefully more in the future) this is
* used to determine whether row could be vacuumed.
*/
struct GlobalVisState *vistest;
/*
* Book-keeping information, used by the snapshot manager
*/
uint32 active_count; /* refcount on ActiveSnapshot stack */
uint32 regd_count; /* refcount on RegisteredSnapshots */
pairingheap_node ph_node; /* link in the RegisteredSnapshots heap */
TimestampTz whenTaken; /* timestamp when snapshot was taken */
XLogRecPtr lsn; /* position in the WAL stream when taken */
/*
* The transaction completion count at the time GetSnapshotData() built
* this snapshot. Allows to avoid re-computing static snapshots when no
* transactions completed since the last GetSnapshotData().
*/
uint64 snapXactCompletionCount;
} SnapshotData;
如上所示,TimestampTz表示snapshot何時產生的,為什么啟用old_snapshot_threshold時會設置該值呢?
因為該值正是用來判斷快照是否過舊的:
/*
* Implement slower/larger portions of TestForOldSnapshot
*
* Smaller/faster portions are put inline, but the entire set of logic is too
* big for that.
*/
void
TestForOldSnapshot_impl(Snapshot snapshot, Relation relation)
{
if (RelationAllowsEarlyPruning(relation)
&& (snapshot)->whenTaken < GetOldSnapshotThresholdTimestamp())
ereport(ERROR,
(errcode(ERRCODE_SNAPSHOT_TOO_OLD),
errmsg("snapshot too old")));
}
這樣我們也比較好理解為什么設置了該參數(shù)時創(chuàng)建的索引在當前事務中不可用:
因為我們不設置該參數(shù)時,在事務中創(chuàng)建索引是可以保證MVCC的一致性,那么索引便是安全可用的。
而使用參數(shù)時,由于TimestampTz被設置,數(shù)據庫會對其進行判斷該行數(shù)據是否已經過期,如果過期了那便會被清理掉,這樣對于索引來說便是不安全的,沒法保證數(shù)據的一致性,對于不是hot-safe的索引,自然要將其indcheckxmin設置為true,防止在事務中創(chuàng)建索引后數(shù)據實際已經過期被刪除的情況。
/*
* At this moment we are sure that there are no transactions with the
* table open for write that don't have this new index in their list of
* indexes. We have waited out all the existing transactions and any new
* transaction will have the new index in its list, but the index is still
* marked as "not-ready-for-inserts". The index is consulted while
* deciding HOT-safety though. This arrangement ensures that no new HOT
* chains can be created where the new tuple and the old tuple in the
* chain have different index keys.
*
* We now take a new snapshot, and build the index using all tuples that
* are visible in this snapshot. We can be sure that any HOT updates to
* these tuples will be compatible with the index, since any updates made
* by transactions that didn't know about the index are now committed or
* rolled back. Thus, each visible tuple is either the end of its
* HOT-chain or the extension of the chain is HOT-safe for this index.
*/
總結
當pg_index的indcheckxmin字段被設置為true時,直到此pg_index行的xmin低于查詢的TransactionXmin視界之前,查詢都不能使用此索引。
而產生這種現(xiàn)象主要有兩種情況:
1. 表上在當前事務中存在broken HOT chains;
2. old_snapshot_threshold被設置時。
原文鏈接:https://foucus.blog.csdn.net/article/details/121701242
相關推薦
- 2022-08-15 VPP靜態(tài)映射實現(xiàn)DNAT
- 2022-10-15 C語言利用UDP實現(xiàn)群聊聊天室的示例代碼_C 語言
- 2022-03-14 Response to preflight request doesn't pass access
- 2022-05-10 通過addroutes動態(tài)添加路由
- 2023-02-04 Python中itertools簡介使用介紹_python
- 2023-12-10 Failed to process, please exclude the tableName or
- 2022-05-15 C++的數(shù)據共享與保護你了解嗎_C 語言
- 2022-12-14 Android?MaterialAlertDialogBuilder修改按鈕屬性_Android
- 最近更新
-
- window11 系統(tǒng)安裝 yarn
- 超詳細win安裝深度學習環(huán)境2025年最新版(
- Linux 中運行的top命令 怎么退出?
- MySQL 中decimal 的用法? 存儲小
- get 、set 、toString 方法的使
- @Resource和 @Autowired注解
- Java基礎操作-- 運算符,流程控制 Flo
- 1. Int 和Integer 的區(qū)別,Jav
- spring @retryable不生效的一種
- Spring Security之認證信息的處理
- Spring Security之認證過濾器
- Spring Security概述快速入門
- Spring Security之配置體系
- 【SpringBoot】SpringCache
- Spring Security之基于方法配置權
- redisson分布式鎖中waittime的設
- maven:解決release錯誤:Artif
- restTemplate使用總結
- Spring Security之安全異常處理
- MybatisPlus優(yōu)雅實現(xiàn)加密?
- Spring ioc容器與Bean的生命周期。
- 【探索SpringCloud】服務發(fā)現(xiàn)-Nac
- Spring Security之基于HttpR
- Redis 底層數(shù)據結構-簡單動態(tài)字符串(SD
- arthas操作spring被代理目標對象命令
- Spring中的單例模式應用詳解
- 聊聊消息隊列,發(fā)送消息的4種方式
- bootspring第三方資源配置管理
- GIT同步修改后的遠程分支